
One stroke magnetic motor
A four stroke engine is called a four stroke engine, and if each stroke does work, it is not considered a one stroke engine. Relying on a magnetic field to do work is called a one stroke magnetic engine. The existing electric motors are driven by magnetic fields and are also magnetic motors. The motor rotor of electric vehicles is made of permanent magnets, which saves a portion of electrical energy. If a crankshaft connecting rod mechanism is used to convert magnetic kinetic energy into mechanical energy, it also needs to save energy. It is difficult to explain how to save energy without using a diagram. After patiently reading it, you will definitely gain something and feel a sudden sense of enlightenment, which may give you some inspiration.
Explanation in conjunction with the attached drawings:

The first stroke is attracted by the permanent magnet 1, which moves to the left and pulls the crankshaft 5 through the connecting rod 4 to rotate 180 degrees. The permanent magnet 1 is integrated with the iron core 2 to complete the first stroke; At this point, coil 3 is energized with direct current, and core 2 generates an electromagnetic field. The N poles are opposite to the N poles, and permanent magnet 1 repels core 2. The core moves to the right, pushing connecting rod 4 and then crankshaft 5, driving flywheel 6 to rotate 180 degrees, completing the second stroke. Then electromagnet 3 loses power, permanent magnet 1 attracts iron core 2 to the next stroke, and in this cycle, flywheel 6 continuously rotates and outputs power. Each stroke does work, is it a one stroke magnetic motor.
In the first stroke, permanent magnet 1 attracts iron core 2 to do work, without consuming electrical energy. Instead, permanent magnet energy is consumed; The second stroke consumes electrical energy, which is converted into kinetic energy, causing flywheel 6 to rotate. If the kinetic energy of flywheel 6's rotation is converted back into electrical energy, coil 3 in the next stroke is charged, ignoring resistance loss, is it not consuming electrical energy? Just add the kinetic energy converted by permanent magnet 1 to attract iron core 2. Does using kinetic energy to supplement the energy lost by a resistor mean that a magnetic motor does not consume electrical energy and can move forever?
The moon attracts tides to rise and fall every day, as the gravitational field energy of the moon is converted into gravitational potential energy, and the tides rise and fall are then converted into electrical energy. Has the energy of the moon been lost year after year? Is it considered a perpetual motion machine? Devices that cannot be realized by humans for the time being are not something that will never be realized in the future, and cannot be predetermined as pseudoscience. The reason for the term 'subversive' is that later generations continue to overturn the judgments of their predecessors. It took about a hundred years from the emergence of the principle of gas turbines to the manufacture of the first prototype, during which many experts concluded that this theory was incorrect. If we all believe the expert's judgment, there will be no jet aircraft.
Facts speak louder than words. It is not easy to complete this experiment. It is necessary to create an electromagnetic field of the same size based on the size of the permanent magnetic field. When the electromagnetic field disappears, it will generate an opposite magnetic field, and the LC oscillation circuit is like this. How to eliminate this opposite magnetic field? This is a working method, and I have other paths to implement electromagnetic permanent motors. The investment in manufacturing is not based on this principle, as this method can easily explain the energy conversion relationship. Not only can magnetic fields achieve permanent motion, but gravity fields also achieve permanent motion, and the working principle is simpler and manufacturing is easier. Suitable for making gigawatt generators, they can only work on Earth and cannot work on space stations. How can there be disruptive results without disruptive ideas, disruptive public servants, and disruptive systems? The reason why I dare not use the name perpetual motion machine is because I am afraid that experts will not look at the content once they look at the name. Regardless of whether it's feasible or not, just relying on my wild imagination, I can still be considered a talent. To do impossible experiments, one needs money, courage, and wisdom.
The energy crisis is imminent, as the use of fossil fuels accelerates global warming, which is directly proportional to the speed of fossil energy extraction. The extreme weather caused by rising temperatures strengthens and increases. But how many people care? How many people are willing to invest in new energy development? The government is pushing to the market, hoping that enterprises will invest in science. What enterprises want is profits. Which enterprise will invest in earth science? A large amount of funds have been invested in the extraction of fossil energy, with the depth of mining reaching tens of thousands of meters. A large amount of underground geothermal energy has emerged through explosive cracks, accelerating the pace of global warming. Taxation is linked to the chicken's fart of enterprises. If the chicken's fart is to increase, the speed of product elimination must be accelerated. Commodity production will accelerate the consumption of fossil energy, which is a vicious cycle. To break the vicious cycle, someone must be willing to invest in the development of new energy. Developing wind and solar energy is like drinking poison to quench thirst, and this person is still half covering their face, unwilling to take a look here. Because the ninety-nine eighty-one difficulty is not over yet.
How big a person has a heart to do, how much courage a leader has, and how great a performance they have. Meat eaters don't want it, poor science and technology have no money, and the people are indifferent. Who does a strong technological country rely on? By the market? I have demonstrated my intelligence and research perseverance, fulfilling my obligation to become a scientific powerhouse, and the results are not important. This is the tragic fate of Chinese folk science, as well as the fate of Chinese basic science. If you think this is science, created by China, and you are moved, take action, scan the QR code to donate money, and save the endangered Chinese folk sciences.